Thread Closed 
The Spinning Ham[Closed] Admin Complaint Against Firefly
#11
From what i saw in this thread i can conclude the following.
Player in question was in mid of charge when he got slay by an admin in question. His last bot was stuck in enemy line inf based on evidence provided in this thread. I read logs also there was no prior warning before slaying the player i question. Those are all facts.

Now to answer and finish this discussion. Admin in question has acted according to current situation as he explained himself in this thread. He explained his reasons for doing so, and I can`t argue with that bc I was not on server. Admin has the power to act on his own at given situation and sometimes mistakes are made. In this particular situation i would check team balance, possible number of closest bots who can be potential target for lone cav, so based on that would decide to slay or wait to see his next move, but that is me. Admin did how he saw most fit and, me personal do not think that your act deserved a slay on spot, but this is deferentially not a reason for suspension of admin or any other act towards him. He was acting on his own perception, there was no deliberate attention to do you harm, was nothing personal. 

So to conclude from what i saw i think you din`t have to be slayed but that is done and we move on. Sometimes it happens to me to, I apologize and we move on with the game. But this is the time when i see and admit my error, it this particular case admin doesn't think he did anything wrong so no need for apologies, and I most centrally will not force him to do so just to make us look any nicer. Also I can`t promise that things like this and similar stuff will not happen again because like I said there was not ill intention toward any of you so not much advice can be given, or much to learn from this. Every situation if different, and requires different approach to it. 

You must understand that in RL (am a lawyer) we all stick to the law and judges judge by the law but not all judges decide the same in same situations, so like here you can write an appeal to present your case, so someone else looks into it. So we did look into this and saw that infraction from admin was a minor and as such does not require any acting on our behalf. You can be satisfied that you have proved your point you wore right (imo) he was wrong.  

You can write a comment if you like so we can lock this thread. 

Hope to see you on server. 

Respectfully 
HA of EU Commander
#12
(07-10-2020, 10:18 AM)Black Knight Wrote: me personal do not think that your act deserved a slay on spot,

(07-10-2020, 10:18 AM)Black Knight Wrote: So to conclude from what i saw i think you din`t have to be slayed

(07-10-2020, 10:18 AM)Black Knight Wrote: But this is the time when i see and admit my error

(07-10-2020, 10:18 AM)Black Knight Wrote: You can be satisfied that you have proved your point you wore right (imo) he was wrong.  

Well folks, the management have literally shot themselves in the foot and confirms the abuse that was made by their admin. Just read the quotes said by their "head admin" carefully.

(07-10-2020, 10:18 AM)Black Knight Wrote: I most centrally will not force him to do so just to make us look any nicer. Also I can`t promise that things like this and similar stuff will not happen again

This just says that the management does not even care about shit in the community. The purpose of admins is making the server/community a nicer place and this statement just contradicts everything and you just said "similar stuff" meaning abuse would happen again.

That sums it up, guilty beyond reasonable doubt, "Mr. Lawyer".
#13
OK we concluded this. Thank you all for taking part in discussion. That is all we have too say regarding this matter. Like i said thing happens and will continue to happen, because we are all humans and we can make mistake. What ever we say or do will not make you pleased so this concludes it all.

As far as admin abuse of its powers CASE DISMISSED


Respectfully
HA of EU Commander


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)